This is an exceptionally well-crafted and comprehensive system prompt. It demonstrates a deep understanding of current SEO best practices, particularly regarding E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness) and human-like content generation, which are critical for ranking well in modern search engines. The level of detail and the specific instructions for HTML formatting, tone, and keyword integration are impressive.
Here’s a detailed breakdown of its strengths and a few minor suggestions for improvement/clarification:
**Strengths:**
1. **Strong Emphasis on Human-Like Content:**
* Explicit instructions like “conversational, authentic tone,” “real-life examples, personal perspectives (using ‘I,’ ‘we,’ ‘my experience’),” “varied sentence structure,” “contractions,” “rhetorical questions,” “analogies,” “colloquialisms,” and “strategic imperfections” are *excellent* for combating detectable AI patterns and making content genuinely engaging.
* The instruction to “inject personality through appropriate humor, enthusiasm, or personal tone” is particularly strong for brand voice.
* “Avoid typical AI patterns like excessive listing, over-explanation, or too-perfect transitions” is crucial.
2. **Comprehensive SEO Integration:**
* **E-E-A-T:** Directly addressing E-E-A-T through “meaningful stories, case studies, or real-world applications” is a major strength.
* **Keyword Placement:** Clear rules for focus keyphrase placement (title, intro, subheadings, conclusion, meta description, within first 100 words).
* **Semantic SEO:** Instructions for using synonyms, related terms, and LSI keyword opportunities demonstrate an advanced understanding of modern SEO.
* **Link Building:** Mandatory external links to “reputable, authoritative sources” and practical advice for internal links.
* **Readability & UX:** Short paragraphs, bullet lists, and a table of contents with anchor links significantly improve user experience, which indirectly boosts SEO.
* **Schema-Friendly Elements:** Suggesting definition lists, FAQs, or how-to sections is forward-thinking for rich snippets.
* **Meta Description:** Very precise instructions for the meta description, ensuring it’s SEO-friendly and click-worthy.
3. **Detailed Formatting & Output Structure:**
* Specific HTML tag usage, including semantic elements like `
`, `
`, and `
`, ensures structured and well-formatted output.
* The mandatory image placeholders with detailed English prompts in the JSON output are brilliant for workflow automation and ensuring visual appeal.
* The clear two-part output structure (HTML block then JSON) is essential for programmatic parsing.
4. **Content Quality Focus:**
* “Practical insights, useful tips, and relevant information backed by data, statistics, or expert opinions” promotes factual accuracy and depth.
* “Unique perspective or insight” pushes the AI beyond simple regurgitation.
* Word count enforcement is clear.
**Minor Suggestions for Improvement/Clarification:**
1. **Focus Keyphrase Repetition Consistency (Minor Conflict):**
* **Current:** The initial “Focus Keyphrase” section states “Ensure the exact focus keyphrase appears at least **2-3 times** in the content.”
* **Current:** The “SEO & Keywords” section states “Repeat the exact focus keyphrase exactly **3–5 times** in the content.”
* **Recommendation:** Unify this to “3-5 times” in both instances for consistency and optimal SEO. The higher range (3-5) is generally better for ensuring sufficient but natural distribution.
2. **Meta Description Keyphrase Shortening (Potential Ambiguity):**
* **Current:** “Meta Description: In the JSON output, start the meta description with the full focus keyphrase exactly as provided… If the provided focus keyphrase contains more than 6 words, shorten it to the most essential 6-word phrase.”
* **Clarification Needed:** Does “start… with the full focus keyphrase exactly as provided” take precedence, or does the “shorten it to the most essential 6-word phrase” rule apply to the *start* of the meta description if the original keyphrase is long? These two statements can conflict. For example, if the keyphrase is “The Ultimate Guide to Mastering Advanced WordPress SEO Techniques,” should the meta description start with this full, long phrase, or a shortened version like “Mastering Advanced WordPress SEO”?
* **Recommendation (Option A – Prioritize Exact):** Clarify that the meta description *must* start with the *exact, full* focus keyphrase, even if it’s long, and then ensure the *rest of the meta description* is concise enough to fit the 156 character limit. The 6-word rule might be better applied to the slug or title only, where conciseness is more critical.
* **Recommendation (Option B – Prioritize Conciseness):** If the intent is for the meta description to *always* start concisely, then explicitly state: “Start the meta description with the most essential, concise version of the focus keyphrase (preferably 6 words or less, capturing the core intent of the provided full focus keyphrase), then follow with a grammatically complete sentence.”
3. **Image Placeholders Quantity Consistency:**
* **Current:** Section 2 (“Formatting”) states: “**Mandatory**: Include at least 2 image placeholders…”
* **Current:** Section 4 (“SEO & Keywords”) states: “Image Placeholders: Include at least one
imageX
in the body to prompt an image.”
* **Recommendation:** Standardize this to “at least 2” in both sections for clarity and consistency, as the more specific instruction (mandatory 2) should prevail.
4. **Redundant “5. JSON Metadata Output” Section:**
* **Current:** The prompt ends with a redundant section labeled “5. JSON Metadata Output” that largely duplicates the instructions already given in the main “5. Output Structure” section.
* **Recommendation:** Remove this redundant section entirely. The “5. Output Structure” section is already comprehensive and well-defined.
**Overall Verdict:**
This is an **excellent** and highly advanced system prompt. The proposed enhancements significantly elevate the quality, human-likeness, and SEO performance potential of the AI-generated content. Addressing the few minor points of consistency and potential ambiguity will make it even more robust and foolproof for the AI.